ALthough broadcast media unable to discuss politics pre an election not so the press as they are full of
'anti semetic' jew hat9ng Green candidates. A party supported by 'well meaning, but naive women'.
So if I say the green party are supported by naive but cough, 'well meaning' women since 1996 does that make me right about anything else, or just the well meaning naive women bit (I don't wonder this to myself as I know the answer is yes, it does make me correct)
If Israel fund Hamas to destabilise the PLO in the first place (suitcases of cash etc), allow October 7th to go ahead, literally, they are going to attack! .. that's fine ... and then delay the intervention for 3+ hours, if you use your attack helicoptres on fleeing festival goers, if you clame babies were beheaded and cooked in ovens, if you spend 2 yeras leveling Gaza and southern lebanon, and drag USA into a war with Iran, if you shoot kids running for food with sniper rifles and bomb an entire hospital because the uncle of a cousin of a brother in law drove a 'memeber of hamas' to a pizza etc. then people have a right to not like what is and has been done without being called 'anti-semetic'.
The 'anti-semetic' thing is to shut peple up see. Make them afraid to say anything. It's called 'taking the fukcing piss' in plain english.
Now I'm not a fan of the green party obviously, depsite loving nature and being green myself, they are toxic and corrupt and full of 'well meaning but naive women' - not my words, the words of someone who works at the daily mail - like pretty much all politicians from the EU/USA down, where the odd brave individual is powerless to do much other than be honourable. Look at Kei Badenock, seems spot on, but given 10 years will/would she have changed a great deal? A bookmaker would have to say, no.
Music and animals, uncorruptable. The Daily Mail, the Isralie and Jewish lobbies, and politicians in general much less so ( Muslims and Chirtians are also corrputable, but mostly don't own the bank of england and the fed, and Palantir, and Phyzer, and Blackrock and therefore most of the S&P 500 and stick together and call anyone who has a go at them, 'anti-angles/jutes/druids/norman/.... he's anti-celt!!'. (we do have 'islamaphobia' but that's another story'
Also, if you're corrupt but relatively broke (ie you don't own 3/4s of the SPX) and un-unified you're much less of a threat, or 'problem'. No less corrupt, just much less of a threat. So it's not about 'being racist', it's more about being correct in your 'view' or 'opinion' based on 'the evidence'.
You can hate all sorts of people, and groups. People who kill foxes on horses who drive range rovers, people who kneecap Irish pub landlords, people who abuse animals and children, people who hang white ex Rhodesian famers by their intestines from barn doors, people who hunt big game, people who lace cocaine with rat poison, people who keep slaves in broom cubourds in abu dhabi, people who fleece husbands for every cent they have despite having done nothing to generate that wealth, time share salesmen and kirby vaccume salesmen, abortion clinic workers, animal tester workers, suicide bombers, scammers, sociopaths in general. And all sorts of people do hate all sorts of people, including those who are actually ok, (would be called 'right wing gammon') but don't appreciate 50+ years out of control immigration no one asked for but got anyway ...
But you can't hate one kind of person because whatever you hate them for, you really only hate them 'for being a semite'
And that is the state we are in today. A pretty bad one, where as in 1984 calling a spade a spade is tantamount to being eliminated.
https://www.dailymail.com/debate/article-15793277/The-vile-Jew-hatred-running-deep-Green-Party.html
“War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.”
Edited on 06/05/2026 at 07:24:08.
|
ALthough broadcast media unable to discuss politics pre an election not so the press ... [more]