The Millionaires Club A forum where gentlepersons may discuss finance and related matters
wit is appreciated - vulgarity is not

Introduction

View Introduction

Archives

View Archives

Search Archives

Info

Adding Images

Adding Links

Links

 aaa Brown attacked by M|EP

 aaa The Great GW Circus

 ADVFN

 AIM

 Barclays Stockbrokers

 BBC

 Bloomberg

 Bullion Desk

 CMC

 CNN

 Companies House

 CSY Computer Systems

 Daily Bayonet

 Dailyfx

 Digital Look

 Fark

 French Property

 FT.com

 Google

 Growthcompany Info

 IG Index

 Interactive Investor

 Live Oil Price

 London Stock Exchange

 Money AM

 Motley Fool

 MSN Money

 Nasdaq

 New York Stock Exchange

 News of the World

 Shares mag

 Sky News

 Stockchallenge

 The Daily Mail

 The Daily Telegraph

 The Dailymash

 The Financial Times

 The Guardian

 The Indepenent

 The New York Times

 The Sun

 The Times Online

 The Wall Street Journal

 Wikipedia

 Yahoo

 You tube


Current Message Return to posts
From: Free Thinking Doggie
Interesting...

When they talk about reducing human CO₂ you should take it personally, because its not about the CO₂.

From Michael S. Northcott, Emeritus Professor at the University of Edinburgh.

‘In 2020, governments created the largest single-year reduction in human CO₂ emissions ever recorded. At the peak of the global lockdowns, daily human-origin CO₂ emissions fell by an estimated 17% — the equivalent of removing the entire economies of the United States and Europe from the carbon cycle for months. But scientists at the Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii, which tracks atmospheric CO₂, recorded that the September 2020 monthly average came in at 411.29 ppm, up from 408.54 ppm in September 2019. The Observatory also reported that May 2020 produced the highest atmospheric concentration of CO2 on record.

The ‘anthropogenic’ causation theory for recent climate events holds that agricultural and industrial CO₂ emissions are the main driver of rising atmospheric CO₂: and that atmospheric CO₂ is the main cause of increases in global temperatures since 1870 and the sole driver since 1970. According to this theory, a 17% global cut in human CO₂ emissions across a full calendar year ought to have produced a measurable declension in atmospheric CO₂ and a slight fall in temperatures. The lockdowns could have been designed as a real-world test of the anthropogenic CO₂ climate theory. And the theory failed the test. Atmospheric CO2 rose as normal, and average global temperatures also rose in 2020. This remarkable real-world falsification of the anthropogenic climate theory ought to have been treated as excellent news, as it indicates forecasts of a forthcoming ‘climate catastrophe’ are wrong. But it received zero public attention and little comment from ‘climate scientists’.

I write as an academic who spent fifteen years in British academia authoring papers and books that took the anthropogenic causation of climate change as a given, and attracted a large public research grant to investigate local community and religious responses to the climate narrative. I had thought that the anthropogenic causation of climate change was settled science. But then the COVID pandemic arose….„




https://x.com/janwe/status/2073632548341608734?s=20

 Current Thread  Author  Time 
Interesting......[more]
 Free Thinking Doggie  16:41:48 
>> Need more private jets creating clouds from con trails, providing shade.
 Hamsterwheel  17:19:55 

You must log in or register before you can post messages (you'll be returned to this page once logged in).



© 2000 sell on the internet (soti) ltd | feedback
www.the-millionaires-club.co.uk ... FTIR Investments of Geneva Place, Road Town, British Virgin Islands